Is Machida Vs Gustaffson A Smart Move?

722
SHARE

Jon Jones is currently out indefinitely with his broken toe injury, does Machida vs Gustaffson in the interim make sense? One fighter has already lost to the current champ and the other fighter is one of the last real challenges available for the champion.

The only scenario where this could be beneficial for the UFC is if Gustaffson defeats Machida. They wouldn’t have to promote the rematch that nobody is requesting and Alexander would get more momentum prior to a bout with Jones.

We already witnessed this scenario before at UFC 157 when Machida faced off against Dan Henderson. Henderson was already the number one contender, but they gave the bout to Chael Sonnen. Jones vs Henderson would of been a huge bout in the light heavyweight division, but unfortunately Machida was named the victor after a split decision.

Should the UFC take a chance by making this fight a reality?

SHARE
Previous articleUFC Exec Marc Ratner Wants To Change The Rules
Next articleDeliberate Southpaws: The Power Behind The Stance
SciFighting News Desk
SciFighting's mission is to bring a higher standard of fitness to both the professional athlete and general population through concise reporting on the latest trends in the science of fighting. Our involvement in mixed martial arts spans both the professional and recreational realms of the sports. In addition to reporting on the news in the industry we function as a think tank, researching new facets of combat science and developing new tools and techniques to analyze theoretical and practical applications.